Well, of course, when he hires the wife of the associate artistic director and the senior principal ballerina and escorts her to his own squealing fan base halfway across the world to present her in his own program, and when he surrounds himself with principal dancers to schmooze and solicit, and when he "medias" himself to a gag-inducing degree and then engineers rumblings of exploring non-ABT options, it really doesn't matter that after four years, he still is not much more than a lightweight trick pony.
Sorry, folks, but after four years, Daniil Simkin still cannot act. His partnering skill is the worst on ABT's stage -- need anyone be reminded how about this time last year, he dropped Skylar Brandt flat on her face in Ratmansky's Nutcracker and then tripped over top of her. Even when he can get it right technically he looks less convincing than Justin Bieber trying to force his tongue down his microphone. He's so slow that he chooses to (disrespectfully) change Balanchine's choreography so he doesn't have to try to meet its demands.
It's really wonderful that Julie Kent and Roberto Bolle had such a great time working for Simkin these past two weeks in Tokyo and everyone would expect them to put in a good word or two for him. But given everything that he still can NOT do, it doesn't justify steamrolling over the senior soloists who are a) more complete artists and b) more deserving.
No donation this year – again.
And let's just add – thank goodness for great artistic directors like Joe Girardi who just signed 18 year veterans Andy Pettitte and Mariano Rivera to multi-million dollar contracts -- despite their injuries. The Yankees don't leave a man's job to an unproven kid, no matter how loud the adoring squealing in the stands is.
When I read this news I already started wondering what you might write about it. ;)
I just cannot imagine him in principal roles. And whenever I saw him doing a piece from a principal role, I had to draw from my own imagination to fill in all the things that were lacking in his presentation. Not that he doesn't know how to present himself in general - just not consistent and convincing for the roles.
Probably they just hope for the squealing audiences to flock into the Met no matter what. I guess there is no hope that things other than that aspect are also considered.
Posted by: Kallima | November 29, 2012 at 05:15 PM
You are correct.
Posted by: Haglund | November 29, 2012 at 05:25 PM
What also worries me is what kind of message it sends out to younger audiences, aspiring students. Speaking of responsibility. Already now I see many thinking to themselves 'In order to become a principal, I have to do the things Daniil is doing/be like Daniil!' and similar things. Not that Daniil is a complete anti-model in my eyes, but the focus is only on certain things he represents and sight is lost of things that exist beyond this.
Posted by: Kallima | November 29, 2012 at 06:00 PM
I agree, Kallima. It's not that Daniil couldn't be world class at everything on the ballet stage -- but he's not going to learn it at ABT where there are nearly no coaches, repetiteurs, or pedagogues. The artistic management has apparently made few demands on him to adapt and improve. He still gears his performances to the competition and gala circuit audience, which after four years is so disappointing to see.
Posted by: Haglund | November 29, 2012 at 06:10 PM
I just saw this news elsewhere and thought of your probable reaction. Oh, dear--and over veteran dancers like Radetsky, too. And Siimkin's reaction on twitter is just as artistically mature as he is--not. There's talking oneself up in the media, and there's poledancing.
Posted by: Kit | November 29, 2012 at 06:15 PM
Apparently all it takes to be a principal at ABT is a twitter account and a trampoline. I was too cranky to write more than the below post, but you get the gist. http://rachelmarch.blogspot.com/2012/11/apparently-all-it-takes-to-be-principal.html
Posted by: Rachelmarch | November 29, 2012 at 08:28 PM
Thanks Rachel. I moved your link up into a post.
If anyone should be morbidly tagged as one of McKenzie's so-called Flagship Forever Soloists, it's Simkin. He fits into none of the non-gala principal roles like an adult, and matches poorly with all partners. And I'm sick of seeing his smirking showmanship on stage.
Truthfully, McKenzie can take the Flagship Soloist pole and ram it.
Posted by: Haglund | November 29, 2012 at 10:34 PM
Even though I read that some people found him very convincing in his Swan Lake, it wouldn't be the first time that some have a very different impression of a dancer than I have. Tastes vary I suppose.
Regarding the smirking showmanship, it sometimes made me wonder if despite the lack of coaches and so on, if there is even a serious will and maturity to change that on his side? Definitely a coach could do something, but usually there is an effort and something to build on. Some dancers just seem very convinced of their own style of doing things and because the publicity and ticket buyers are there, people just let them do. I hope it is just a matter of maturity and he will explore different approaches some time in the future. Better sooner than later though. I already found it shocking to find out that he's older than me, considering the style of his tweeting.
Posted by: Kallima | November 30, 2012 at 08:26 AM
Kallima, you make a very strong point in saying "Some dancers just seem very convinced of their own style of doing things and because the publicity and ticket buyers are there, people just let them do." His massacre of Balanchine's choreography in Stars & Stripes is a case in point where he liberally substituted his own tricks for the historical and copyrighted choreography and didn't have a clue as to the proper presentation. Already at age 25 he thinks he's a force more important than Balanchine.
Posted by: Haglund | November 30, 2012 at 09:57 AM
That's it. When he was first hired, I thought I'd give him year to learn artistry from the wonderful examples available from principle to corps level, male and female. Then 2 tears; Aaron Scott did the dame roles better.
No more money from me for awhile.
Posted by: dc | November 30, 2012 at 04:36 PM
same role, not dame roles. Typing in the dark
Posted by: dc | November 30, 2012 at 04:38 PM
True, dc. Aaron was better. Salstein was better. Radetsky was better as Lankendem. Matthews was better in Coppelia. Tamm was a much, much better Nutcracker Prince. That's the short list. Every head to head comparison shows Simkin coming up short.
Posted by: Haglund | November 30, 2012 at 07:25 PM
Speaking of Arron Scott, can he get his promotion?!! His performances from last season (many of them debuts) were outstanding, and he has proven to be a consistant, yet exciting, performer with superior acting skills. I think it would be well-deserved!
Posted by: k | December 02, 2012 at 09:38 PM
Hi K. I think Arron, along with Tamm, Phillips and several others, may be McKenzie's "flagship" corpsmen. It doesn't seem that they will get their deserved chances.
Posted by: Haglund | December 03, 2012 at 12:45 PM