It’s been that kind of spring. At long last, truths that many of us have known and chanted about for quite a while have been confirmed in live testimony. We’re not talking about Russian interference in the election, either.
Last night on the stage of the Metropolitan Opera House, Sarah Lane bourréed into the floor the point that justice delayed is justice denied, and she did it sweetly – like a DeWalt 2000 RPM hammer drill – cordless power tulle in lipstick, if you will.
Five years ago Sarah thrilled Spain as Odette/Odile opposite Angel Corella’s Siegfried. Three years prior to that, she debuted as Giselle at Lake Cities Ballet in Texas where the iconic role was set on her by Julie Kent. In the intervening eight years and five years, she has been repeatedly overlooked for casting in these roles while the artistic director imported non-ABT Eastern European dancers who had nothing to offer the company or the audience that ABT’s own dancers could not already offer. When he found it uncomfortable to import, he switched to casting based on political and financial motives as opposed to talent and skill as criteria.
So, here we are in 2017 having missed eight years of Sarah’s Giselle and five years of her Odette/Odile. And, of course, Sarah has missed eight years and five years of opportunity to develop her Giselle and Odette/Odile on the stage. Those years are gone – pfft – gone. The time will never be recovered. But thank goodness the times and climate seem to be changing at ABT. Our own best dancers are being allowed to dance. We wonder to whom we should give thanks for the company’s artistic rescue that has become apparent this past year – perhaps, in part, to the new board chair whose sister toiled in the ABT corps back in the ‘70s? Maybe these days there is more of a realization of the damage that reliance on non-ABT dancers and failure to develop the in-house talent have done to the company.
Last night Sarah Lane’s portrayal of Odette/Odile was half-unexpected; literally, half of us never expected to see the day when she would dance the lead. What was half-unexpected in her performance was the riveting, polished characterization of Odile. We had seen the tenderness, vulnerability, and fragile soul of Odette before in Sarah; that’s why we always thought that she would be a natural for the role. But we had never seen her deliver an alluring, bitchy character on stage, and it was down right fascinating. There was hiss & spit, tease & taunt, connive & provoke all fluffing up her layers of delicate tulle and making her irresistible to Daniil Simkin’s Siegfried.
Beautiful arabesque balances held strongly for multiple counts of music were among the lasting images of Sarah’s Odile. Her variation began with stable double pirouette and single attitude en dehor turn ending on one leg in plie. Chaines, stepovers, and basic pirouettes were all fine. When the music for the fouettes began, it was slow and unassertive — probably of no help to Sarah at all. It didn’t sound like anything thrilling or important was about to happen on the stage. But she began solidly enough and felt comfortable enough to throw in an extra revolution from time to time. The sequence started to travel sideways, and she lost her releve about three or four counts of music from the end – which basically meant she lost two fouettes and a finishing multiple pirouette. She was visibly disappointed but perked up quickly. While the standard supported pirouettes with Daniil were generally fine in both the Odette and Odile PdDs, those finger turns were a problem to keep on the axis, as has been the case before last night.
Sarah’s Odette showed beautiful fluidity in the port de bras — here was a vulnerable creature of delicately boned wings – almost hummingbird-fragile. In her variation, the battements a la second with the ronde de jambe were thrown higher and with more authority than Sarah is generally noted for. It appeared that she might be trying to hold them at their apex which would have been quite spectacular had she gotten a firm grip on them. The sorrow and hopelessness of her character was palpable.
Throughout the evening, Sarah and Daniil maintained a good chemistry. Daniil always seems so much more mature on stage when he has to be responsible for someone else rather than just himself. Although the pinched expression with the face turned into the light was not always convincing, Daniil’s tenderness toward Odette and his burning desire for Odile were always believable. His variations without the overload of pointless tricks were very pleasant to watch. His famous balancing arabesque was held in check at 90 degrees rather than higher. Overall, his dancing was more weighty which suited him well.
Haglund will give a ✅ to Alban Lendorf for his purple von Rothbart characterization. Still, those tour jetes had Haglund wondering where Lendorf's legs were. Gray Davis as the swamp creature got the job done, but we’re guessing that he’s not 100% recovered from his back injury. The Pas de Trois (Cassandra Trenary, Skylar Brandt, and Joseph Gorak) was 2/3 brilliant and 1/3 rather hesitant about dancing beyond 75% of capacity. Is Gorak injured, too, or was he just trying to be exceedingly careful? Blaine Hoven with these two fem-firecrackers would have slayed the audience.
The four Cygnettes (Rachel Richardson, Betsy McBride, Nicole Graniero, and Breanne Grandlund) were nearly flawless with Nicole expertly handling that difficult backend position in the diagonal of pas de chats.
The women’s Corps de Ballet looked fabulous in Act II. We noticed earlier in the week that the apex to the triangle of swans has been, as it was last night, Kaho Ogawa whose graceful limbs and textbook perfect lines are the cat's pajamas. We wish there was more of a traditional Act IV for the swans to be highlighted in. That is the only real weakness to this overall production which has top tier designs by Zack Brown. His tutus for the swans are among the most beautiful ever. We hope they will never be replaced.
Our H.H. Pump Bump Award, an angel-winged stiletto by Sophia Webster, is bestowed upon Sarah Lane for her beautiful Odette last evening.
Agreed Haglund-Last night was a great night. Sarah was wonderful and I thought she and Daniil gave solid performances. While I prefer Sarah and Herman together, she and Daniil did have good chemistry last night. At stage door, someone mentioned that they hoped she'd dance again Saturday and Sarah replied that she'd like another performance after rehearsing for it. I'd love to see her and Herman do Swan Lake but I'm grateful I got to see them do Giselle.
Posted by: Lena | June 16, 2017 at 07:09 PM
Thanks so much for this thoughtful review. I thought Sarah was wonderful, there were moments of her Odette where I literally got goose bumps. I also very much enjoyed her Odile, it was unfortunate about the fouettes though. To me it didn’t take much away from how lovely I found her performance, but I hope it isn’t held against her come promotion time. I really just wanted the night to go perfectly for her and she was obviously disappointed in that moment. She just needs more chances to perform and I’m sure she could bang that section out! Daniil has never been my most favorite dancer but I thought he did wonderfully last night. He brought a certain dreaminess to the role that I really enjoyed, and his ending leap to death was spectacular! I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a Siegfried go down at quite such a dramatic angle. I’d never seen Alban Lendorf before, and from what I’d read I wasn’t sure I’d like him (I’m still not sure I’d like him, for example as Siegfried or Albrecht) but I actually loved his von Rothbart. One final note, Skylar! She just brings a giant smile to my face every time I see her perform! Overall it was a wonderful night. Brava, Sarah.
Posted by: Catherine | June 16, 2017 at 07:43 PM
Simkin's IG post this afternoon stated that Lane had four rehearsals prior to her performance. If she could achieve this level of art and expression with only four rehearsals, what could four weeks or four months of rehearsals bring? I fully expect to see another Swan Lake from her, with complete technical assurance added to her emotional performance and expressive dancing. Lane's port de bras was made for this ballet. The gorgeousness of her Odette, and the sizzle of her Odile are qualities I won't forget soon. She was so close to nailing those bloody fouettes. Next time, for sure.
Posted by: LLF | June 16, 2017 at 09:02 PM
Simkin always struck me as a bit inward, a bit self involved as a dancer. But when I saw him dance that Tharp piece (which he didn't seem to like), he only opened up when Lane grabbed his hand. Now that they have had more time to dance together and understand each other, they have made a great partnership. I've never seen him so attentive as he tried to protect Lane throughout her debut. It was touching. And it made his declaration of fidelity all the more moving after the first Pas de deux. Not only was he acting Siegfried, he was promising Lane he would be there for her.
I have to say the fouettes were a minor problem in a performance that triumphed against the odds. Incredible odds, to say the least. Besides she only ended the sequence a measure or two early. The orchestra and the conductor bear some responsibility for the snafu. In fact, I've never seen the orchestra and the conductors so off their game this year. From Ormsby forcing dancers to stick to his tempos to Barker slowing down sections for inexplicable reasons, not to mention the lead violinist flubbing his solo during Teuscher's debut. What is going on with them?
I have to admit, I'm not a fan of the costumes for this production. For posed pictures, the swan costumes look lovely and very 19th century Degas old fashioned. But they cut the dancers off in odd ways. The same problem existed during Degas' time and you can see it in his paintings and sketches. I prefer the standard modern tutus.
Lane gave an almost completist study of Odette/Odile. All she needed was more rehearsal time. Certainly more than just the 4 sessions that Simkin stated on his Instagram. Here is to hoping she gets to build her work in more performances of this ballet.
Posted by: melponeme_k | June 16, 2017 at 09:05 PM
Thanks for your insights, HH. It was a rewarding Swan Lake last night. I just want to say, in defense of Daniil and Alban, that they may reflect the younger generation and its influence by film. I am a stage director and teacher and many of the younguns' in theater assume their subtlety carries on stage. Opera singers are tending to become too subtle also because of the HD broadcasts. I don't see it with dancers yet, but Alban and Daniil are showing signs of it, at least to me. Is that what Joseph Gorak is suffering from, or he just need oomph? I'm not sure yet.
It took me a while to "see" Alban's dramatic "intentions," on stage, especially after watching him on Youtube (with close-ups). He studied with not only Nikolaj Hubbe, but with Anna Laerkesen, one of the most spiritual dancers I have ever seen. She brought me to tears in Moon Reindeer every night (with the dreamy Henning Kronstam) when the RDB came to NY. Alban's pedigree is superb, let's see how he develops. I sense people find him bland. He's not, at leat to me. Technically he needs to settle into the Russian Style; he's (gorgeously) beefy and there is a lot of him to move around. His Bournenville is amazingly good, although I do feel the beef.
Daniil, in Giselle, was oh, so subtle in moments. For instance, the daisy-petal bit he did with his back to the audience. Did he think a camera would pick it up? He also didn't follow through after the instinctive reach for his sword in the scene with Hilarion. He didn't register a reaction that he just might have betrayed himself. Film acting? He probably thought he betrayed himself, but in a film, the camera would have Hilarion's reaction. I don't know but I get vibes that he and Alban being film-subtle.
In any event, we have two great dancers. Let's hope management notices these, what I assume are stylistic glitches, and set them straight.
I was impressed by Alban's ovation after attempting to tread on Marcelo territory, I told him after the performance that he excelled in the most difficult role at Ballet Theater. He looked puzzled but laughed after I explained that no one has bettered Marcelo in it, but he came very close.
By the way, Kaho Ogawa has the most incredible smile on stage. It radiates. There's a star there, I think, from seeing her Youtube "baby" performances. She has legs like the young Kolpakova.
These are just thoughts I want to share with you and other readers. Am I the only one who senses a dramatic "subtlety" with these two superb dancers?
Posted by: Eddie | June 16, 2017 at 09:22 PM
Sarah Lane thanked Gillian Murphy in her Instagram post for giving her "expert advice" and for staying and taking photos. I do not know much about the ballet world other than watching the performances, but I am sure there is a lot of competition just like anywhere else where the opportunities are scarce and the pressure is high. Hearing that someone who is regarded as probably the premier ballerina of her organization is willing to spend time and effort on advising and helping an upcoming colleague makes me feel really good.
I hope that the Lane/Simkin pairing - in principal roles - will become a regular part of the Spring ABT season.
Posted by: alexul | June 16, 2017 at 09:55 PM
Eddie, thanks for the comments.
I agree that Daniil (and many others) "act" for the small screen. It's quite a problem in the Met. The dancers know how to adjust their steps for big Met stage. They know how to adjust their makeup for the house. But they don't adjust their acting.
Thanks for reminding me of the daisy incident during Giselle. That really irked me. I can't believe that the artistic director didn't step in and say, "No. That's wrong for this theater. Don't do it that way." Daniil wrecked an important moment in the ballet -- for the audience, that is. Maybe he really enjoyed it himself, however. 🙄
Re: Alban. For this viewer, his beefiness interferes too much.
Posted by: Haglund | June 16, 2017 at 10:18 PM
Kaho Ogawa has the most beautiful arabesque in the entire corps. I think it's because her proportions are perfect, geometrically speaking. Plus she seems to have a naturally fluid upper body. She doesn't have to try to make herself look elegant; she has a natural elegance. Thank you for pointing her out to us, Haglund.
Posted by: angelica | June 16, 2017 at 10:20 PM
Sarah was sublime. It was a thrill and a privilege to be in the audience watching and cheering her on (I had tears in my eyes throughout). Thank you, as always, H., for your excellent and thoughtful review and insights. I am looking forward to seeing Veronika (whom I adore) today, too!
Posted by: Deborah Broide | June 17, 2017 at 06:54 AM
Thanks Haglund for the beautiful review.
Brava, brava, brava Sarah!
Posted by: Erica | June 17, 2017 at 06:19 PM
Thanks for writing this up. Haglund. So happy for Sarah!
Posted by: Bryan | June 18, 2017 at 12:31 PM
Eddie, do you think the prevalence of cinema broadcasts (not for ABT, but there are a number of those for other companies and dancers might go there and watch performances fromacross the pond for example) also plays a role in the "small" acting? I guess it would be difficult to strike a balance that would project into a large opera house but doesn't look odd in close-ups on a cinema screen.
Posted by: Kallima | June 19, 2017 at 03:16 PM
Kalima, good question. In my work with actors, I see they need to adjust their performance to each medium. I can't see a balance. It's an actor's job to have a flexible technique. Maybe Ratmansky may have a say in it because his staging of Swan Lake has very "vivid" mime in it. Another solution may be in body language.
When I started going to the ballet 60 years ago, we were just getting out of the rule to never reflect acting in your face. See Ulanova, Fonteyn, Alonso and early Plisetskaya in classics, except in DonQ, in which she was delicious in the first act, but reflected no emotion in the dream sequence or the last act. It was done through the body.
It's a different time and I'm not sure what the answer is but to be flexible and adjust to the medium.
Posted by: Eddie | June 19, 2017 at 05:55 PM
As for ABT's best Rothbart—Gomes and Hallberg have given me chills, but let's not forget Vladimir Malakhov either, or Carlos Molina. This dynamic role is a good indicator of the state of the male roster, because in competitive times it's a real knockout. Ten or fifteen years ago there was never a shortage of dancers who could perform the role well. Stiefel and Radetsky too.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to get to NYC this year, but it sounds like there's a little more vibrancy on the women's side currently. That is a change! I'm glad to hear about Simkin's development. I'm a fan of Blaine, but when it comes to missed opportunities, I always think of Jared Matthews first.
Posted by: Annie H. | June 29, 2017 at 03:13 PM