New York City Ballet dressed itself to the hilt with two more glistening performances of Jewels on Wednesday and Thursday. Every single debut was a 100 carat diamondized beauty set among the polished performances of gems including Ashley Laracey in Emeralds, Tiler Peck with Roman Mejia and Emily Kikta in Rubies, and Joseph Gordon in Diamonds.
Thursday evening Haglund became lost in Emeralds — spellbound, transported into an unblinking hypnotic state by Mira Nadon and Davide Riccardo and their rapport galore. There was something spiritual about this pair, an enhanced connection perhaps, that added to the fascination of this plotless work. And while it is tempting to focus here on Nadon’s luxurious style and mesmerizing movement, we have to say that our attention was drawn time and time again to Riccardo’s beautiful leg lines, generous arabesques, and articulate feet. We really need to see more of him in Balanchine’s principal roles.
Contrast this performance with the night before when Ashley Bouder embarrassed both the company and choreographer. Never have we seen such a swollen ballerina in a principal role at New York City Ballet. Never have we seen NYCB allow one egomaniac to soil Balanchine the way Bouder did on Wednesday night with her unprofessional appearance and her substandard dancing. And the air-biting to show what a glorious time she was having while flapping and jiggling her arm-flesh was just too much. She looked and danced like she was making a bid for a Jardiance commercial where the happy, fat lady celebrates how wonderful it is to be obese and how we should all normalize fatness. Frankly, we’re sick and tired of this dancer's selfish, toxic, ego-driven effort to push her way around a ballet company where she no longer fits. The constant excuse of her “possibly career ending” injury is worn down to its threads, and the ongoing use of her child as a shield from criticism is disturbing, to say the least. Bouder’s time is up.
We have to criticize NYCB management for allowing Bouder to bull her way onto the stage and for risking injury to a world-class artist like Chun Wai Chan by pairing him with Bouder and exploiting his good-sport nature. The effort it took for him to swing Bouder into the air looked like an invitation to a hernia.
Wednesday’s Emeralds wasn’t a total loss due to the exquisite performances of Ashley Laracey and Peter Walker. Laracey’s Keatsian sensuousness is the most beautiful we’ve ever seen in this role on NYCB’s stage. The generosity of her port de bras, the arch of her back, and her regal silhouette are breathtaking. Walker was perfection as a partner — gallant, attentive and strikingly beautiful in his lines and noble carriage.
Wednesday evening’s Rubies with Tiler Peck, Roman Mejia and Emily Kikta was thrilling from minute 1 to 19. Some years back when Tiler debuted in this role, Haglund thought it was a misfire. But her performance this week showed a wonderfully spirited, exceptionally fit, glowing artist who mined Rubies to extract and reveal her treasured musicality. Mejia came completely uncorked in the Villella role. His go-for-it-what-the-hell enthusiasm in this lines-don’t-matter role was so charged with electricity that it was almost fatal — he nearly killed us. The addition of Emily Kikta’s Tall Girl into this mix – well, it was definitely time to call the ambulances. She battement-ed her legs through the air like they were paddles at The Pleasure Chest.
Thursday’s Rubies celebrated a debuting cast of Emma Von Enck, Jovani Furlan, and Christina Clark. Sass-sational Emma with her aculeate feet and prickly charm ran away with this ballet. Jovani took a very good first stab at his role although he seemed less comfortable with the character portrayal than with the steps. Christina’s Tall Girl was in the mold of Tess Rechlein’s cool, confident interpretation with a coy ready-for-play aspect. The gasp-inducing length of her legs and the speed with which she could wield them was astonishing. She had all the technique, all the equipment, and all the confidence needed to deliver this role which has suddenly become the focal point of Rubies thanks to a bevy of strong new interpreters like Kikta, Nadon and LaFreniere. Looking forward to more from her.
The performances on Wednesday and Thursday gifted us with two new remarkable Diamond ballerinas — each so different yet so unmistakably right for the role. Unity Phelan was quite introspective but lovely nonetheless. This role was originally made for the most introspective Balanchine ballerina ever. One rarely got to gaze into the eyes of Farrell or crack her sense of privacy. That characteristic works well in Diamonds. We kept watching Unity Phelan and thinking that this is the way it was intended. Her technique has steadily gained strength and it was difficult to find any glaring technical weaknesses in her performance on Wednesday. However, she may never be a favorite of those who have become addicted to the excesses in Sara Mearns' highly individual interpretation and who consider any Diamond not like her to be a flawed gem. Also a different Diamond was Isabella LaFreniere whose orthodox technical foundation and verticalness allowed for another distinctive interpretation — one with more regal ballerina authority. The breadth of her movement and the sweep of her limbs were stunning in this ravishing debut opposite Chun Wai Chan (also debuting) who likewise is a more orthodox trained dancer. His solos were gorgeous in form, grace, spin, and articulation. His partnering was sublime.
The Thursday evening Jewels was loaded with excitement and artistic growth — all of it an immense pleasure to witness. But the one performance which we keep replaying in our minds is that of Ashley Laracey’s Emeralds on Wednesday. Our H.H. Pump Bump Award, courtesy of Manolo Blahnik, is bestowed upon her.
Omg the Jardiance commercial. Dying!!
Posted by: formerdancer | September 23, 2023 at 10:40 PM
Yes, when I heard "Jardiance" all I could think of was that woman marching around with a high school band -- don't know if she was the coach or the "majorette" or what -- and yacking about Jardiance.
Posted by: Allie Kenney | September 24, 2023 at 12:09 AM
Must report that Saturday night's Diamonds was startlingly brilliant. The way LaFreniere held and pulled those arabesques through the music was incredible. Her elegance created from strength, musicality, and imagination was gorgeous. Chan's solos were equally dazzling with beautiful turns a la seconde that accelerated and were punctuated with beautiful pirouettes.
Emeralds -- Nadon and Riccardo were so in tune and resplendent. Hopefully, their futures also include a Diamonds together.
Rubies -- Emma Von Enck and Jovani Furlan crackled with heat. On her second performance, Christina Clark gave her Tall Girl still more authority and tease.
A superb evening of Balanchine. Simply superb.
Posted by: Haglund | September 24, 2023 at 10:43 AM
Thank you as always, Haglund, for these reviews. I was sadly out of town for the entire run of Jewels until this afternoon's matinee and I've loved reading these reviews and imagining all of these lovely dancers' debuts.
Very much looking forward to seeing Woodward,
Nadon, Juxley, Fairchild, Mearns and especially Janzen (in his farewell performance) this afternoon.
I saw Emeralds rehearsal video of Bouder on Instagram. I don't know what else to say.
Posted by: Rachel Perez | September 24, 2023 at 12:42 PM
Oh, I know which Jardiance ad Haglund has in mind! Not the drum majorette but the one with the Big Gal in a blue sweater, gallivanting through a park… 🎼 “The little pill with the big story to tell!” 🎶
Posted by: Jeannette | September 24, 2023 at 01:27 PM
This one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aromts0OiHs
Posted by: Haglund | September 24, 2023 at 01:30 PM
When you accept a job as a professional ballet dancer in a top New York ballet company you accept the need to stay fit and maintain an appropriate weight. When a Director tells you to lose weight, that is not "fat-shaming." Nor is it ridicule. It's a responsibility that comes with being a ballet dancer, much less a Principal. The media who entertains Bouder's dilemma is also contributing to miseducation of the public. There are plenty of fit dancers on the rise ready to take her place. (You can tell I watched a few clips of these segments out of curiosity.) Just lose the ten pounds and finish your career on a high note.
Posted by: Georgiann | September 24, 2023 at 02:09 PM
H
Saw JEWELS Tues-night. Debut night. Most everyone new in their ‘settings’ (see what I did there?) .
Damn right! Nadon was a, ‘where did she come from, moment ?!?!” Never really noticed her before. Just lovely. She and Riccardo really embodied l'esprit de la grâce française. And LeCrone was beautiful.
The Ruby-nubies were wonderful. Clark just occupied the entire stage when she was on it. Were there boys there, too?
Emma was adorable, and Furlan terrific. However, the partnering of VonE and Furlan was interesting. I'm used to a ‘little guy ’ i.e. Vilella, Clee-ford, De Luz, Garcia, Huxley, etc in that part. Always same size as his partner. It was interesting to see 6’+ Furlan partnering tiny Emma. His battements were higher than hers. Gave the PDD a totally new dimension for me.
Diamonds couple were lovely. Now I understand what the fuss about Chan is. Agreed, cant wait to see him loosen up. LaFreniere was also lovely. On pointe, so to speak. But also seemed a little tense. Relax that forehead gurl! Well, after all it was 'Debut Night!”
And H, you called it. The Diamonds corps (and I thought the Rubies guys) were all over the place. I wondered if maybe the second cast didnt get as much rehearsal as the first night’s. But if you saw it, it indicates everyone needs another couple hours in the rehearsal studio.
Final question; feathers? Did Diamonds always have feathers, H? I get the Imperial Russian connection, but rather than ‘Vieille Russie’, they were giving me a ‘poultry’ vibe. Whatever.
But for God sake, IT WAS JEWELS!!! What’s there to complain about???
PS: 'Jardiance'!!! You are killing me.
Posted by: gstavella | September 24, 2023 at 04:39 PM
Right, that one. That probably wasn't the first to come to mind because I usually look the other way or leave the room when it comes on.
Posted by: Allie Kenney | September 24, 2023 at 06:07 PM
Oooops, I meant THURS night. Typo.
Posted by: gstavella | September 24, 2023 at 06:13 PM
gstavella,
"a poultry vibe" 😂😂😂
Here's link to photos of Diamonds in 1968. Ain't no feathers.
https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/303f0f50-bf22-0134-ee1b-00505686a51c
Posted by: Haglund | September 24, 2023 at 06:36 PM
Georgiann, you put your finger on a big problem when you pointed out that the media is contributing to mis-education of the public. Ballet dancer + body discussion = clickbait = revenue.
Posted by: Haglund | September 24, 2023 at 06:56 PM
Bingo! Yes, that’s the Jardiance ad that I had in mind. ROTFL!
Posted by: Jeannette | September 24, 2023 at 07:04 PM
"Jardiance!" Hahahaha. Meanwhile my local company is featuring a Trojan horse-face rather than her feminine and technically superior peers. Her hooves look larger than the poor feller's that has to partner her. And he's a big lad. As with Bouder, it's so inclusive.
Posted by: Shawn | September 25, 2023 at 09:11 AM
An astute YouTube commenter pointed out that the Jardiance ad features a heavy woman surrounded by normal weight people. All the normal weight folks are dancing while the star really doesn't move much. But the viewer is fooled into thinking she *is* moving because of context. Look at it again and you'll see what the commenter means.
Great analogy, Haglund!
Posted by: Diana | September 25, 2023 at 09:18 AM
I think the YouTube commenter that you found is in error. The commercial features a lot of morbidly obese people as well as some who are not. The idea is to convey that obesity is normal, even a happy state, and that all a person needs to do is take Jardiance and they can continue living a wonderful life as an obese person in the lifestyle that got them where they are today.
If I were a physician, I would protest the promotion of obesity as normal, fun, and happy by refusing to write scripts for the drug. Obesity should be handled in the media the way smoking=lung cancer is handled, not celebrated as normal.
Nor should a ballet company promote unfit dancers as normal.
Posted by: Haglund | September 25, 2023 at 09:39 AM
I think it's important to note that Ashley Bouder, while not in professional "ballerina" shape, is a far cry from what any doctor/the medical community would consider "obese" (from a BMI perspective). As much as we are all joking, she's not a candidate for the Jardiance commercial, or any commercial targeted at people who are truly obese (or overweight) and need to lose weight for health reasons (versus, in her case, professional reasons).
Posted by: Rachel Perez | September 25, 2023 at 10:06 AM
True, she's not obese or overweight by pedestrian standards.
Posted by: Haglund | September 25, 2023 at 10:09 AM
In light of all the recent accusations of emotional and sexual abuse and how it effects younger dancers, there is also the issue of physical abuse.
Not from outside, but physical abuse the dancers impose on themselves.
There now seems to be an issues with the flip side of self destructive starvation, being overweight.
Dance, ballet specifically is a cruel mistress. Weight, and age put stress on the joints. Any doctor will tell you that even 5 lbs additional body weight will increase the stress on your joins by 25 lbs. And that’s not even with taking in consideration of the rigors forcing unnatural positions (turnout) during daily class. Add that to the fact the joints you had at 16, 18 etc are NOT the joints you have now at 35+ Though you may desperately wish they were.
Show me a former principal ballet dancer over the age of 50 who has NOT had one or multiple joint replacements, and Ill show you one who is on heavy meds. (Isn’t Farrell on her third set of hips?)
So the point could be made that an older dancer insistent on performing overweight is modeling to younger dancers that they can/must abuse their bodies in order remain on stage.
Posted by: gstavella | September 25, 2023 at 12:17 PM
And then you have a dancer like Megan Fairchild, who is only about 6 months younger than Bouder but, as far as I can tell, still going gangbusters. I don't know a lot about her routine, but had the impression she takes exceptional care of herself, especially after her pregnancies, including activities/regimes I'd never heard of before. But maybe it just comes down to genes.
Posted by: Allie Kenney | September 25, 2023 at 04:47 PM
And then there is the toll it takes on the man and his joints when the woman is carrying around extra weight or bulk and also wants to wear extra rehearsal clothing to hide it.
Posted by: Haglund | September 25, 2023 at 04:55 PM
Agreed. And if we want the men to be lithe, white-tight wearing complete dancers, as opposed to carnival strongmen just there for the lifts, they usually need to be light as well.
Seems like a 40 lb. weight difference between partners is about right. If it's say 5-10 because the ballerina is overweight, we're going to need weightlifting belts on stage.
Posted by: Shawn | September 25, 2023 at 05:58 PM
NFL players commonly get weighed weekly and twice daily during training camp. If they don't make their weight, they can be fined or suspended. Imagine a lineman saying, "Really Coach, the league needs to be more tolerant of body types and less strict on maintenance by veterans. We're human beings, you know." Where would a bold lecture like that land him?
Posted by: Haglund | September 25, 2023 at 06:17 PM
Megan Fairchild is not only dancing superbly (her Rubies I just saw was extraordinary) but has three children - and in her second pregnancy she had TWINS. I doubt she ever got back the waistline she had before babies, but to the audience, all that stress on her body and joints is invisible. Some luck of good genes maybe but also dedication and discipline.
I do feel sympathy for whatever struggles Ashley Bouder is going through; she's been a supreme performer for years, knows what it takes, and there must be some reason she can't seem to get herself back on track. Having seen her in Emeralds I totally agree she did not belong on the stage. I feel it's up to management to make these tough calls because you can't always leave it up to the dancers. Dancers want to dance as much as they can often even when they're not at performance quality. Management didn't step up here.
It's still a week before the Gala when she is next scheduled to dance. Hopefully management's faith in Bouder will be rewarded and she will look better by then.
Posted by: elfantgirl | September 25, 2023 at 06:26 PM
Bouder is basically blackmailing management because they know if they ask her to resign she will raise a big woke stink to the media and they probably feel in this day and age that they can't afford to lose public goodwill (or ticket sales).
Do they have anything regarding weight in their contract? If I were NYCB, I would be consulting lawyers at this point to make sure all bases are covered and then lay out all the reasons she has not fulfilled her obligations as an employee.
It's a shame because otherwise, Emeralds was glorious that night.
Posted by: Gerry | September 26, 2023 at 11:33 AM
I think the "woke" concerns may be overblown at this point. There are common-sense parameters in many professions. In this instance, not only is ballet a visually aesthetic art form, but weight becomes an issue in partnering. Would NYCB be forced to adjust its choreography to have two male dancers do a lift for a too-heavy ballerina? What about a dancer who develops a condition that prevents moving fast enough across the stage? Will they have to slow down the piece? I think there's too much timidity here; common sense should prevail. It's a shame that these things have to get played out in the press.
Posted by: Solor | September 26, 2023 at 02:01 PM
Has anyone heard anything about a potential cancellation of tonight's performance given the flooding/MTA mess?
Posted by: Rachel Perez | September 29, 2023 at 01:42 PM
Got an email from NYCB saying that the performance will go on but if anyone with tickets can't make it, they can contact NYCB by Oct 13th and exchange for another performance.
Posted by: Haglund | September 29, 2023 at 05:46 PM
Yes, thanks Haglund. Shortly after I posted, NYCB posted to the site that the performance would go on as planned. They sent a list of performances that could be selected in last night's stead (oddly, a few of the performances were in the past ;), but I hopefully helped them correct that).
I was unable to go due to the subway being largely malfunctioning (not to mention the roads), but went ahead and bought tickets to tonight's performance of Balanchine II so I could see the same cast.
Posted by: Rachel Perez | September 30, 2023 at 05:17 AM