Here is a link to the letter recently sent by the dancers to management along with a similar letter sent to management during the 2017 contract negotiations. The 2017 contract dispute was resolved after the dancers voted to strike and upend an upcoming tour.
https://www.musicalartists.org/letters-sent-to-abt-in-2017-and-2023/
Given that the ABT Board knew for several years, possibly as many as 5 or more, that it was about to lose nearly half its season each spring at the Met Opera House, there really is not much of an excuse for not developing a plan to replace those weeks in its most important market. Nor does the Board have much of an excuse for the lame strategy it came up with to re-build the cultural force of the company by dedicating it to woke-ish DEI initiatives. It needs to dedicate itself to great dancing. We saw lots of great dancing this past week, and we saw some formerly brilliant artists hanging on for dear life to careers that need to be closed out so that more wonderful artists can move into the spotlight. The ABT Board can do better at planning, and the artistic management can do better in making sure that the company puts its best feet forward all the time.
At present, it seems that the frustration of the dancers may be due to management not having its decision makers at the negotiating table. Get the decision makers to the table. Put Andrew Barth and Sharon Patrick in the room and get the job done. If Bob Iger could sit in on the negotiations that ended the Writers' Guild strike, Andrew Barth can sit across the table from the ballet dancers -- perhaps even next to them. Come on, people, get it done.
It seems like this is a pretty common theme every few years.
Is this an industry thing? A New York 'win-at-all-costs' thing? Is revenue not high enough to meet the requests?
Why can't (or won't) companies and artists reach agreements before things get to the point where there are strikes and lockouts?
Posted by: Hugh | October 23, 2023 at 11:07 PM
Yeah, it seems this stress rocks the company all too frequently. It could be helpful if the contract prohibited the dancers and stage managers from working for ABT after the contract expired. It would then be impossible for the company to book performances past the expiration date and would encourage a longer length contract, greater board commitment, and more collaborative & timely negotiations.
Posted by: Haglund | October 24, 2023 at 08:27 AM
What I want to know is does ABT not have the money to pay the dancers their salaries, benefits and pension? They “saved” money for years by reducing the pay and payment into the pension plan. Their biggest asset is the dancers. They need to pay them. It is unconscionable to me. ( PS. The part in the letters about ABT disrespecting the dancers at negotiations is appalling). This whole thing upsets me. And yes, who is at the negotiating table for management besides Susan Jaffe?
Posted by: MoMo | October 24, 2023 at 02:13 PM
Momo,
It is upsetting, isn't it? I don't know who is at the negotiating table, but I'm interested to know. Maybe some of the dancers can disclose that -- particularly who is there for management. If they are hired lawyers, well, forget about getting anything done because their job is to get as much in givebacks as they can coerce from the dancers and give as little as possible.
Posted by: Haglund | October 24, 2023 at 02:30 PM
Tonight is ABT’s Fall Gala. A number of dancers wore their AGMA T-shirt’s before going into the Gala. James Whiteside wore his Hermes tuxedo with his sweatshirt pinned to the back of his suit. ( PS Another dance website published ABT’s Financials and Tax forms for the last eight years. Only one year they were in the “red”, 2019 ( pandemic).
Posted by: MoMo | October 24, 2023 at 09:55 PM
Any thoughts about getting Andrew Barth's sister, former ABT member, Carmen, involved with the negotiations? Granted, she's not on the board of trustees, but I would think she'd have a distinct perspective of what the current company are having to deal with. And yes, the economics are quite different from when she danced with ABT but still....Just a thought....
Posted by: Beth CP | October 25, 2023 at 01:59 AM
It just seems that the dancers' situation at ABT is so dire that a strike is warranted even at the expense of the upcoming tour to China and the Nutcracker at Segerstrom. Let management explain to the Chinese that the dancers of America's National Ballet Company are striking for decent pay and benefits; that America, which cries for human rights in China all the time, doesn't pay its vaunted national ballet dancers a living wage and adequate benefits.
The ABT board is waving the national flag while starving the proletariat. I don't like seeing this at all. Not one bit. There is plenty of money in New York to support this ballet company. How is it that ABT's board can't seem to tap into it?
Posted by: Haglund | October 25, 2023 at 08:39 AM
On another note but related to the shortened Met season -- I just don't know how these dancers (especially the higher ranked ones) justify staying at a company with so little performance time. Cassie Trenary, a principal, danced what? 4 times this fall season? And maybe 4 times for the Met season? Someone in the prime of her ballet life (as short as that is) is actually onstage a couple handfuls of time all year. It's quite insane when compared with NYCB or even to a lesser extend SFB or PNB.
Posted by: formerdancer | October 25, 2023 at 12:57 PM
Formerdancer, ITA.
While being an ABT dancer takes a full time, year around effort, the dancers barely get seasonal employment. If ABT can't provide better, they shouldn't be America's National Ballet Company.
Posted by: Haglund | October 25, 2023 at 01:51 PM
formerdancer: I would say Trenary has been on the stage a lot compared to some other principals.
Posted by: Allie Kenney | October 26, 2023 at 01:11 AM
Allie, for example -- with backup numbers? Compared to which current principals who are not on leave?
Posted by: Haglund | October 26, 2023 at 07:09 AM
"I just don't know how these dancers (especially the higher ranked ones) justify staying at a company with so little performance time."
This company has a lot of dead weight at the top that it is carrying. And the house needs to be cleared. The ball was dropped in not grooming new faces to replace the older dancers who should be retiring now. Plus the house was cleaned with all the wrong dancers. Quite a number of them had potential but were not in favor. But all that was before Jaffe's time. However she should have cleaned the roster immediately. It could be the board is an impediment to that much needed action.
Posted by: melponeme_k | October 26, 2023 at 03:32 PM
haglund, no one was promoted in ABT this year?
Posted by: Mark | November 11, 2023 at 02:32 PM
Hi, Mark.
Not yet. It seems the delay may be due in part to the fact that there are no new contracts that can be signed until the dancers' union AGMA and ABT management agree on a new overall contract.
Posted by: Haglund | November 11, 2023 at 02:47 PM